Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs Core i3-1215U
Description
The E5-1620 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1620 v2 gets a score of 144.6 k points while the i3-1215U gets 129.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1620 v2 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E5-1620 v2 gets a score of 144.6 k points while the i3-1215U gets 129.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-1620 v2 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306e4
906a4
Core
Ivy Bridge-EP
Alder Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
0.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 2011
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4 /8
6/8
TDP
130 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+x4x32 kB
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x1280+2x2048 kB
Cache L3
10240 kB
10240 kB
Date
September 2013
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
34.37k points
80.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
144.57k points
185.6k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E5-1620 v2
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.55k
15.63k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
12.14k
20.2k (x1.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.83k
9.94k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
8.06k (x1.66)
TOTAL
34.37k
53.83k (x1.57)
Multithread
E5-1620 v2
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
51.93k
35.72k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
56.7k
56.41k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.81k
25k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
12.14k
12.48k (x1.03)
TOTAL
144.57k
129.6k (x0.9)
Performance/W
E5-1620 v2
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
399 points/W
2381 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
436 points/W
3761 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
183 points/W
1667 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
93 points/W
832 points/W
TOTAL
1112 points/W
8640 points/W
Performance/GHz
E5-1620 v2
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
3217 points/GHz
3553 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3113 points/GHz
4591 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1238 points/GHz
2260 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1244 points/GHz
1832 points/GHz
TOTAL
8812 points/GHz
12234 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4