| | | | | | |

Xeon E3-1225 vs E5-2620 v4


Description
The E3-1225 is based on Sandy Bridge architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1225 gets a score of 69 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 182.4 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 2.6 times faster than the E3-1225. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
206a7
406f1
Core
Sandy Bridge
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.4 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
95 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
6144 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2011
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
23.94k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
68.97k points
237.83k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E3-1225
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2.63k
2.6k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
7.2k
7.55k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.71k
2.61k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.55k
2.03k (x0.79)
TOTAL
16.08k
14.79k (x0.92)

Multithread

E3-1225

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
8.23k
17.41k (x2.12)
Test#2 (FP)
22.82k
75.46k (x3.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
11.68k
26.25k (x2.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.12k
4.65k (x2.2)
TOTAL
44.85k
123.78k (x2.76)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E3-1225
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
9.65k
8.22k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
7.76k
12.06k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.95k
4.01k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.57k
2.89k (x1.12)
TOTAL
23.94k
27.18k (x1.14)

Multithread

E3-1225

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
30.52k
61.34k (x2.01)
Test#2 (FP)
24.1k
90.21k (x3.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
12.01k
26.2k (x2.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.34k
4.62k (x1.98)
TOTAL
68.97k
182.37k (x2.64)

Performance/W
E3-1225
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
321 points/W
722 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
254 points/W
1061 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
126 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
25 points/W
54 points/W
TOTAL
726 points/W
2146 points/W

Performance/GHz
E3-1225
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2839 points/GHz
2739 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2283 points/GHz
4021 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1162 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
757 points/GHz
963 points/GHz
TOTAL
7041 points/GHz
9059 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4