| | | | | | |

Xeon E3-1270 v2 vs E5-1620 v2


Description
Both models E3-1270 v2 and E5-1620 v2 are based on Ivy Bridge architecture.

"Ivy Bridge is the last Intel microarchitecture for which there is official driver support for Windows XP . It is made under 22 nm Tri-Gate transistor (""3D"") technology and is basically a Sandy Bridge shrink. It has PCI Express 3.0 support and RdRand instruction for security tasks."

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1270 v2 gets a score of 139.4 k points while the E5-1620 v2 gets 144.6 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-1620 v2 is 1 times faster than the E3-1270 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
306a9
306e4
Core
Ivy Bridge-H2
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4 /8
4 /8
TDP
69 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+x4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
10240 kB
Date
May 2012
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
36.29k points
34.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
139.38k points
144.57k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E3-1270 v2
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
13.16k
12.55k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
12.51k
12.14k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5k
4.83k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.62k
4.85k (x0.86)
TOTAL
36.29k
34.37k (x0.95)

Multithread

E3-1270 v2

E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
51.89k
51.93k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
57.35k
56.7k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.74k
23.81k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.4k
12.14k (x1.9)
TOTAL
139.38k
144.57k (x1.04)

Performance/W
E3-1270 v2
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
752 points/W
399 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
831 points/W
436 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
344 points/W
183 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
93 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
2020 points/W
1112 points/W

Performance/GHz
E3-1270 v2
E5-1620 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3374 points/GHz
3217 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3207 points/GHz
3113 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1282 points/GHz
1238 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1441 points/GHz
1244 points/GHz
TOTAL
9304 points/GHz
8812 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4