Xeon E3-1270 v2 vs Core i7-7020U
Description
The E3-1270 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i7-7020U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1270 v2 gets a score of 139.4 k points while the i7-7020U gets 60.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1270 v2 is 2.3 times faster than the i7-7020U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1270 v2 gets a score of 139.4 k points while the i7-7020U gets 60.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1270 v2 is 2.3 times faster than the i7-7020U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
806ea
Core
Ivy Bridge-H2
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4 /8
2/4
TDP
69 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
May 2012
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
36.29k points
33.63k points
Mean multithread perf.
139.38k points
73.15k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E3-1270 v2
i7-7020U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.16k
8.17k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
12.51k
12.42k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5k
2.87k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.62k
4.68k (x0.83)
TOTAL
36.29k
28.13k (x0.78)
Multithread
E3-1270 v2
i7-7020U
Test#1 (Integers)
51.89k
17.65k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
57.35k
30.44k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.74k
7.19k (x0.3)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.4k
4.79k (x0.75)
TOTAL
139.38k
60.07k (x0.43)
Performance/W
E3-1270 v2
i7-7020U
Test#1 (Integers)
752 points/W
1177 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
831 points/W
2029 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
344 points/W
479 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
93 points/W
320 points/W
TOTAL
2020 points/W
4005 points/W
Performance/GHz
E3-1270 v2
i7-7020U
Test#1 (Integers)
3374 points/GHz
3550 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3207 points/GHz
5399 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1282 points/GHz
1247 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1441 points/GHz
2035 points/GHz
TOTAL
9304 points/GHz
12231 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4