Xeon E3-1270 v2 vs Ryzen 3 3200G
Description
The E3-1270 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the 3200G is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1270 v2 gets a score of 139.4 k points while the 3200G gets 166.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.2 times faster than the E3-1270 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1270 v2 gets a score of 139.4 k points while the 3200G gets 166.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3200G is 1.2 times faster than the E3-1270 v2 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
810f81
Core
Ivy Bridge-H2
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
AM4
Cores/Threads
4 /8
4/4
TDP
69 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2012
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
36.29k points
49.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
139.38k points
168.69k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E3-1270 v2
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
13.16k
13.05k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
12.51k
22.88k (x1.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5k
5.39k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.62k
7.31k (x1.3)
TOTAL
36.29k
48.63k (x1.34)
Multithread
E3-1270 v2
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
51.89k
51.73k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
57.35k
87.74k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.74k
20.74k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.4k
6.57k (x1.03)
TOTAL
139.38k
166.79k (x1.2)
Performance/W
E3-1270 v2
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
752 points/W
796 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
831 points/W
1350 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
344 points/W
319 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
93 points/W
101 points/W
TOTAL
2020 points/W
2566 points/W
Performance/GHz
E3-1270 v2
3200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3374 points/GHz
3262 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3207 points/GHz
5719 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1282 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1441 points/GHz
1828 points/GHz
TOTAL
9304 points/GHz
12157 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4