Xeon E3-1270 v2 vs Core i3-1215U
Description
The E3-1270 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge architecture while the i3-1215U is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1270 v2 gets a score of 139.4 k points while the i3-1215U gets 129.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1270 v2 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1270 v2 gets a score of 139.4 k points while the i3-1215U gets 129.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1270 v2 is 1.1 times faster than the i3-1215U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306a9
906a4
Core
Ivy Bridge-H2
Alder Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.5 GHz
0.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1155
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4 /8
6/8
TDP
69 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32/4x64+2x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x1280+2x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
10240 kB
Date
May 2012
April 2022
Mean monothread perf.
36.29k points
80.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
139.38k points
185.6k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
E3-1270 v2
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.16k
15.63k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
12.51k
20.2k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5k
9.94k (x1.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.62k
8.06k (x1.43)
TOTAL
36.29k
53.83k (x1.48)
Multithread
E3-1270 v2
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
51.89k
35.72k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
57.35k
56.41k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
23.74k
25k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.4k
12.48k (x1.95)
TOTAL
139.38k
129.6k (x0.93)
Performance/W
E3-1270 v2
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
752 points/W
2381 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
831 points/W
3761 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
344 points/W
1667 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
93 points/W
832 points/W
TOTAL
2020 points/W
8640 points/W
Performance/GHz
E3-1270 v2
i3-1215U
Test#1 (Integers)
3374 points/GHz
3553 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3207 points/GHz
4591 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1282 points/GHz
2260 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1441 points/GHz
1832 points/GHz
TOTAL
9304 points/GHz
12234 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4