| | | | | | |

Xeon E3-1230 v5 vs Core i7-920


Description
The E3-1230 v5 is based on Skylake architecture while the i7-920 is based on Nehalem Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1230 v5 gets a score of 37.9 k points while the i7-920 gets 47.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-920 is 1.2 times faster than the E3-1230 v5. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
106a5
Core
Skylake-S
Bloomfield
Architecture
Skylake
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.993 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
80 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
October 2015
November 2008
Mean monothread perf.
9.52k points
16.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.88k points
47.2k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E3-1230 v5
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
0.7k
1.97k (x2.82)
Test#2 (FP)
2.8k
4.43k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0.85k
2.75k (x3.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.88k
2.53k (x1.34)
TOTAL
6.23k
11.68k (x1.87)

Multithread

E3-1230 v5

i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
2.74k
7.71k (x2.82)
Test#2 (FP)
12.87k
18.81k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.89k
13.76k (x3.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.03k
5.07k (x0.84)
TOTAL
25.52k
45.34k (x1.78)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E3-1230 v5
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
2.59k
6.12k (x2.36)
Test#2 (FP)
3.94k
4.76k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1k
2.78k (x2.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
2k
2.67k (x1.34)
TOTAL
9.52k
16.33k (x1.72)

Multithread

E3-1230 v5

i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
10.4k
19.26k (x1.85)
Test#2 (FP)
16.64k
14.96k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.51k
8.05k (x1.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.33k
4.92k (x0.78)
TOTAL
37.88k
47.2k (x1.25)

Performance/W
E3-1230 v5
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
130 points/W
148 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
208 points/W
115 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56 points/W
62 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
38 points/W
TOTAL
474 points/W
363 points/W

Performance/GHz
E3-1230 v5
i7-920
Test#1 (Integers)
681 points/GHz
2044 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1037 points/GHz
1591 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
263 points/GHz
930 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
525 points/GHz
891 points/GHz
TOTAL
2506 points/GHz
5457 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4