Xeon E3-1230 v5 vs Core i3-370M
Description
The E3-1230 v5 is based on Skylake architecture while the i3-370M is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1230 v5 gets a score of 37.9 k points while the i3-370M gets 18.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1230 v5 is 2.1 times faster than the i3-370M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1230 v5 gets a score of 37.9 k points while the i3-370M gets 18.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1230 v5 is 2.1 times faster than the i3-370M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
20655
Core
Skylake-S
Arrandale
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
0.933 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Socket G1
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
80 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2015
Mean monothread perf.
9.52k points
8.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.88k points
18.15k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E3-1230 v5
i3-370M
Test#1 (Integers)
2.59k
3.4k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
3.94k
2.35k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1k
1.35k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
2k
1.39k (x0.7)
TOTAL
9.52k
8.49k (x0.89)
Multithread
E3-1230 v5
i3-370M
Test#1 (Integers)
10.4k
7.18k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
16.64k
5.13k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.51k
3.5k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.33k
2.33k (x0.37)
TOTAL
37.88k
18.15k (x0.48)
Performance/W
E3-1230 v5
i3-370M
Test#1 (Integers)
130 points/W
205 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
208 points/W
147 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56 points/W
100 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
67 points/W
TOTAL
474 points/W
518 points/W
Performance/GHz
E3-1230 v5
i3-370M
Test#1 (Integers)
681 points/GHz
1419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1037 points/GHz
978 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
263 points/GHz
561 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
525 points/GHz
580 points/GHz
TOTAL
2506 points/GHz
3537 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4