Xeon E3-1230 v5 vs Core 2 Duo SU7300
Description
The E3-1230 v5 is based on Skylake architecture while the SU7300 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1230 v5 gets a score of 37.9 k points while the SU7300 gets 11.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1230 v5 is 3.4 times faster than the SU7300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1230 v5 gets a score of 37.9 k points while the SU7300 gets 11.3 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1230 v5 is 3.4 times faster than the SU7300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
1067a
Core
Skylake-S
Peryn-3M
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
1.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 956
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/2
TDP
80 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
3072 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
0 kB
Date
October 2015
January 2009
Mean monothread perf.
9.52k points
6.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.88k points
11.27k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E3-1230 v5
SU7300
Test#1 (Integers)
2.59k
1.48k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
3.94k
3.27k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1k
1.24k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
2k
0.93k (x0.47)
TOTAL
9.52k
6.92k (x0.73)
Multithread
E3-1230 v5
SU7300
Test#1 (Integers)
10.4k
2.54k (x0.24)
Test#2 (FP)
16.64k
5.49k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.51k
2.1k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.33k
1.13k (x0.18)
TOTAL
37.88k
11.27k (x0.3)
Performance/W
E3-1230 v5
SU7300
Test#1 (Integers)
130 points/W
254 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
208 points/W
549 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56 points/W
210 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
113 points/W
TOTAL
474 points/W
1127 points/W
Performance/GHz
E3-1230 v5
SU7300
Test#1 (Integers)
681 points/GHz
1139 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1037 points/GHz
2515 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
263 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
525 points/GHz
714 points/GHz
TOTAL
2506 points/GHz
5325 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4