Xeon E3-1230 v5 vs Ryzen 7 3750H
Description
The E3-1230 v5 is based on Skylake architecture while the 3750H is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1230 v5 gets a score of 25.5 k points while the 3750H gets 124 k points.
Summarizing, the 3750H is 4.9 times faster than the E3-1230 v5. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1230 v5 gets a score of 25.5 k points while the 3750H gets 124 k points.
Summarizing, the 3750H is 4.9 times faster than the E3-1230 v5. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
810f81
Core
Skylake-S
Picasso
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
80 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2015
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
9.52k points
46.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.88k points
175.18k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E3-1230 v5
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
0.7k
3.78k (x5.43)
Test#2 (FP)
2.8k
16.42k (x5.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0.85k
4.75k (x5.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.88k
5.51k (x2.93)
TOTAL
6.23k
30.46k (x4.89)
Multithread
E3-1230 v5
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
2.74k
15.18k (x5.55)
Test#2 (FP)
12.87k
74.87k (x5.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.89k
27.85k (x7.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.03k
6.08k (x1.01)
TOTAL
25.52k
123.97k (x4.86)
Performance/W
E3-1230 v5
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
34 points/W
434 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
161 points/W
2139 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
49 points/W
796 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
75 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
319 points/W
3542 points/W
Performance/GHz
E3-1230 v5
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
183 points/GHz
945 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
738 points/GHz
4105 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
223 points/GHz
1187 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
496 points/GHz
1378 points/GHz
TOTAL
1640 points/GHz
7615 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4