Xeon E3-1230 v5 vs A4 3310MX
Description
The E3-1230 v5 is based on Skylake architecture while the 3310MX is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1230 v5 gets a score of 37.9 k points while the 3310MX gets 16.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1230 v5 is 2.3 times faster than the 3310MX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1230 v5 gets a score of 37.9 k points while the 3310MX gets 16.5 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1230 v5 is 2.3 times faster than the 3310MX. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506e3
300f10
Core
Skylake-S
Llano
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Socket FS1
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/2
TDP
80 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
kB
Date
October 2015
June 2011
Mean monothread perf.
9.52k points
11.4k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.88k points
16.5k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E3-1230 v5
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
2.59k
3.98k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
3.94k
4k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1k
2.05k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
2k
1.37k (x0.69)
TOTAL
9.52k
11.4k (x1.2)
Multithread
E3-1230 v5
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
10.4k
5.74k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
16.64k
6.05k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.51k
2.85k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.33k
1.86k (x0.29)
TOTAL
37.88k
16.5k (x0.44)
Performance/W
E3-1230 v5
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
130 points/W
128 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
208 points/W
134 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56 points/W
63 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
41 points/W
TOTAL
474 points/W
367 points/W
Performance/GHz
E3-1230 v5
3310MX
Test#1 (Integers)
681 points/GHz
1593 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1037 points/GHz
1602 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
263 points/GHz
818 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
525 points/GHz
547 points/GHz
TOTAL
2506 points/GHz
4560 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4