| | | | | | |

Xeon E3-1230 v5 vs Core i5-12500H


Description
The E3-1230 v5 is based on Skylake architecture while the i5-12500H is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1230 v5 gets a score of 37.9 k points while the i5-12500H gets 194.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12500H is 5.1 times faster than the E3-1230 v5. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506e3
906a3
Core
Skylake-S
Alder Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.8 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/16
TDP
80 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280/2x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
18432 kB
Date
October 2015
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
9.52k points
58.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
37.88k points
225.65k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E3-1230 v5
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
0.7k
6.93k (x9.96)
Test#2 (FP)
2.8k
18.76k (x6.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0.85k
9.46k (x11.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.88k
8.17k (x4.34)
TOTAL
6.23k
43.33k (x6.95)

Multithread

E3-1230 v5

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
2.74k
18.04k (x6.59)
Test#2 (FP)
12.87k
66.78k (x5.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.89k
37.55k (x9.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.03k
6.08k (x1.01)
TOTAL
25.52k
128.45k (x5.03)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
E3-1230 v5
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
2.59k
21.93k (x8.47)
Test#2 (FP)
3.94k
18.79k (x4.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1k
10.5k (x10.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
2k
8.11k (x4.07)
TOTAL
9.52k
59.33k (x6.23)

Multithread

E3-1230 v5

i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
10.4k
61.07k (x5.87)
Test#2 (FP)
16.64k
86.08k (x5.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.51k
41.08k (x9.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.33k
6.02k (x0.95)
TOTAL
37.88k
194.25k (x5.13)

Performance/W
E3-1230 v5
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
130 points/W
1357 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
208 points/W
1913 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
56 points/W
913 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
79 points/W
134 points/W
TOTAL
474 points/W
4317 points/W

Performance/GHz
E3-1230 v5
i5-12500H
Test#1 (Integers)
681 points/GHz
4873 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1037 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
263 points/GHz
2334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
525 points/GHz
1802 points/GHz
TOTAL
2506 points/GHz
13184 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4