Xeon E3-1220 v3 vs Core i5-8365U
Description
The E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-8365U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1220 v3 gets a score of 140.8 k points while the i5-8365U gets 197.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8365U is 1.4 times faster than the E3-1220 v3 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1220 v3 gets a score of 140.8 k points while the i5-8365U gets 197.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-8365U is 1.4 times faster than the E3-1220 v3 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
806ec
Core
Haswell-WS
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4 /4
4/8
TDP
80 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2013
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
39.16k points
59.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.76k points
197.46k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E3-1220 v3
i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.17k
24.37k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
22.68k (x2.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
4.98k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.65k
7.7k (x1.66)
TOTAL
39.16k
59.73k (x1.53)
Multithread
E3-1220 v3
i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
73.13k
89.45k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
42.06k
85.57k (x2.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.03k
19.02k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.54k
3.41k (x0.45)
TOTAL
140.76k
197.46k (x1.4)
Performance/W
E3-1220 v3
i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
914 points/W
5964 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
526 points/W
5705 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225 points/W
1268 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
227 points/W
TOTAL
1759 points/W
13164 points/W
Performance/GHz
E3-1220 v3
i5-8365U
Test#1 (Integers)
5478 points/GHz
5944 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3014 points/GHz
5531 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1368 points/GHz
1214 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1328 points/GHz
1879 points/GHz
TOTAL
11188 points/GHz
14568 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4