Xeon E3-1220 v3 vs Core i5-3210M
Description
The E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i5-3210M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1220 v3 gets a score of 76.1 k points while the i5-3210M gets 37.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1220 v3 is 2 times faster than the i5-3210M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1220 v3 gets a score of 76.1 k points while the i5-3210M gets 37.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1220 v3 is 2 times faster than the i5-3210M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
306a9
Core
Haswell-WS
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
Socket G2 (988B)
Cores/Threads
4 /4
2 /2
TDP
80 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
June 2013
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
39.16k points
24.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.76k points
51.73k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
E3-1220 v3
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
3.45k
3.08k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
9.96k
8.58k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.26k
3.76k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.27k
3.99k (x0.93)
TOTAL
21.94k
19.42k (x0.89)
Multithread
E3-1220 v3
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
14.01k
5.79k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
37.68k
18.77k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
17.05k
8.74k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.35k
4.59k (x0.62)
TOTAL
76.09k
37.89k (x0.5)
Performance/W
E3-1220 v3
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
175 points/W
165 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
471 points/W
536 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
213 points/W
250 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
92 points/W
131 points/W
TOTAL
951 points/W
1083 points/W
Performance/GHz
E3-1220 v3
i5-3210M
Test#1 (Integers)
985 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2845 points/GHz
2768 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1217 points/GHz
1213 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1220 points/GHz
1287 points/GHz
TOTAL
6268 points/GHz
6263 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4