Xeon E3-1220 v3 vs Core i3-10100
Description
The E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the i3-10100 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1220 v3 gets a score of 140.8 k points while the i3-10100 gets 162.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100 is 1.2 times faster than the E3-1220 v3 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1220 v3 gets a score of 140.8 k points while the i3-10100 gets 162.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10100 is 1.2 times faster than the E3-1220 v3 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
a0653
Core
Haswell-WS
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4 /4
4/8
TDP
80 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
June 2013
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
39.16k points
55.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.76k points
162.33k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E3-1220 v3
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
19.17k
22.74k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
20.31k (x1.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
4.71k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.65k
7.65k (x1.65)
TOTAL
39.16k
55.41k (x1.42)
Multithread
E3-1220 v3
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
73.13k
71.95k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
42.06k
67.7k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.03k
16.43k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.54k
6.25k (x0.83)
TOTAL
140.76k
162.33k (x1.15)
Performance/W
E3-1220 v3
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
914 points/W
1107 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
526 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225 points/W
253 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
96 points/W
TOTAL
1759 points/W
2497 points/W
Performance/GHz
E3-1220 v3
i3-10100
Test#1 (Integers)
5478 points/GHz
5288 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3014 points/GHz
4724 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1368 points/GHz
1095 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1328 points/GHz
1779 points/GHz
TOTAL
11188 points/GHz
12886 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4