Xeon E3-1220 v3 vs Ryzen 3 5300U
Description
The E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 5300U is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1220 v3 gets a score of 140.8 k points while the 5300U gets 198.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 5300U is 1.4 times faster than the E3-1220 v3 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1220 v3 gets a score of 140.8 k points while the 5300U gets 198.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 5300U is 1.4 times faster than the E3-1220 v3 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
860f81
Core
Haswell-WS
Lucienne
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4 /4
4/8
TDP
80 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
June 2013
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
39.16k points
52.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.76k points
198.38k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E3-1220 v3
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
19.17k
15.09k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
23.74k (x2.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
8.32k (x1.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.65k
5.19k (x1.12)
TOTAL
39.16k
52.35k (x1.34)
Multithread
E3-1220 v3
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
73.13k
67k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
42.06k
89.94k (x2.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.03k
36.84k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.54k
4.6k (x0.61)
TOTAL
140.76k
198.38k (x1.41)
Performance/W
E3-1220 v3
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
914 points/W
4467 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
526 points/W
5996 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225 points/W
2456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
307 points/W
TOTAL
1759 points/W
13226 points/W
Performance/GHz
E3-1220 v3
5300U
Test#1 (Integers)
5478 points/GHz
3972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3014 points/GHz
6246 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1368 points/GHz
2190 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1328 points/GHz
1367 points/GHz
TOTAL
11188 points/GHz
13775 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4