Xeon E3-1220 v3 vs A12 9800
Description
The E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell architecture while the 9800 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1220 v3 gets a score of 140.8 k points while the 9800 gets 100.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1220 v3 is 1.4 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the E3-1220 v3 gets a score of 140.8 k points while the 9800 gets 100.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E3-1220 v3 is 1.4 times faster than the 9800. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
306c3
660f51
Core
Haswell-WS
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
3.1 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.5 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1150
Socket AM4
Cores/Threads
4 /4
4/4
TDP
80 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
64 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
256 kB
2X2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
kB
Date
June 2013
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
39.16k points
37.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
140.76k points
100.79k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
E3-1220 v3
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
19.17k
13.42k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
10.55k
17.61k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.79k
3.77k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.65k
3.06k (x0.66)
TOTAL
39.16k
37.86k (x0.97)
Multithread
E3-1220 v3
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
73.13k
40.46k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
42.06k
43.18k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.03k
12.78k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
7.54k
4.37k (x0.58)
TOTAL
140.76k
100.79k (x0.72)
Performance/W
E3-1220 v3
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
914 points/W
622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
526 points/W
664 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
225 points/W
197 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
67 points/W
TOTAL
1759 points/W
1551 points/W
Performance/GHz
E3-1220 v3
9800
Test#1 (Integers)
5478 points/GHz
3195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
3014 points/GHz
4193 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1368 points/GHz
897 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1328 points/GHz
728 points/GHz
TOTAL
11188 points/GHz
9013 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4