Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Xeon W-2223
Description
Both models 3206R and W-2223 are based on Cascade Lake architecture.
Cascade Lake is a architecture focused on high-end CPUs that uses the 14nm process. There are i9 and Xeon models using 4 different cores: Cascade Lake-SP and Cascade Lake-AP for servers, Cascade Lake-W for workstations and Cascade Lake-X for home high-end Pcs.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the W-2223 gets 243.2 k points.
Summarizing, the W-2223 is 1.1 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Cascade Lake is a architecture focused on high-end CPUs that uses the 14nm process. There are i9 and Xeon models using 4 different cores: Cascade Lake-SP and Cascade Lake-AP for servers, Cascade Lake-W for workstations and Cascade Lake-X for home high-end Pcs.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the W-2223 gets 243.2 k points.
Summarizing, the W-2223 is 1.1 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
50657
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Glacier Falls
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/8
TDP
85 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x1024 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
8448 kB
Date
February 2020
October 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
59.68k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
243.18k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3206R
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
1.97k
3.97k (x2.02)
Test#2 (FP)
8.15k
14.5k (x1.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
4.78k (x2.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.84k
8.19k (x1.69)
TOTAL
17.32k
31.45k (x1.82)
Multithread
3206R
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
15.73k
15.56k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
64.78k
59.23k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
22.87k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
6.85k (x1.32)
TOTAL
103.77k
104.51k (x1.01)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3206R
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
25.09k (x1.94)
Test#2 (FP)
10.97k
20.76k (x1.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.54k
5.07k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.09k
8.76k (x1.72)
TOTAL
31.52k
59.68k (x1.89)
Multithread
3206R
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
103.33k
111.43k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
87.67k
100.2k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
24.67k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
6.89k (x1.4)
TOTAL
216.02k
243.18k (x1.13)
Performance/W
3206R
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
1216 points/W
929 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/W
835 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
237 points/W
206 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
2541 points/W
2027 points/W
Performance/GHz
3206R
W-2223
Test#1 (Integers)
6801 points/GHz
6432 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5774 points/GHz
5324 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
1301 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2678 points/GHz
2247 points/GHz
TOTAL
16588 points/GHz
15303 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4