| | | | | | |

Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Core i7-6600U


Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i7-6600U is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the i7-6600U gets 79.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 3206R is 2.7 times faster than the i7-6600U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
406e3
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Skylake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
8/8
2/4
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
4096 kB
Date
February 2020
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
39.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
79.22k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3206R
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
1.97k
2.75k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
8.15k
12.23k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
3.9k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.84k
5.61k (x1.16)
TOTAL
17.32k
24.48k (x1.41)

Multithread

3206R

i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.73k
5.23k (x0.33)
Test#2 (FP)
64.78k
25k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
8.98k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
4.73k (x0.91)
TOTAL
103.77k
43.95k (x0.42)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3206R
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
16.72k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
10.97k
14.7k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.54k
3.4k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.09k
4.9k (x0.96)
TOTAL
31.52k
39.73k (x1.26)

Multithread

3206R

i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
103.33k
33.41k (x0.32)
Test#2 (FP)
87.67k
31.66k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
8.18k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
5.97k (x1.22)
TOTAL
216.02k
79.22k (x0.37)

Performance/W
3206R
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
1216 points/W
2227 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
237 points/W
546 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
398 points/W
TOTAL
2541 points/W
5282 points/W

Performance/GHz
3206R
i7-6600U
Test#1 (Integers)
6801 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5774 points/GHz
4325 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
999 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2678 points/GHz
1441 points/GHz
TOTAL
16588 points/GHz
11684 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4