| | | | | | |

Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Core i5-8265U


Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i5-8265U is based on Whiskey Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the i5-8265U gets 143.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.5 times faster than the i5-8265U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
806ec
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Whiskey Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
BGA1528
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/8
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2020
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
46.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
143.23k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3206R
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
1.97k
3.68k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
8.15k
16.08k (x1.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
4.99k (x2.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.84k
7.95k (x1.64)
TOTAL
17.32k
32.69k (x1.89)

Multithread

3206R

i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.73k
14.29k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
64.78k
61.15k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
16.53k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
3.72k (x0.71)
TOTAL
103.77k
95.69k (x0.92)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3206R
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
19.19k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
10.97k
17.47k (x1.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.54k
4.04k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.09k
5.97k (x1.17)
TOTAL
31.52k
46.67k (x1.48)

Multithread

3206R

i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
103.33k
64.43k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
87.67k
61.91k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
13.36k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
3.52k (x0.72)
TOTAL
216.02k
143.23k (x0.66)

Performance/W
3206R
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
1216 points/W
4296 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/W
4128 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
237 points/W
890 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
235 points/W
TOTAL
2541 points/W
9548 points/W

Performance/GHz
3206R
i5-8265U
Test#1 (Integers)
6801 points/GHz
4920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5774 points/GHz
4478 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2678 points/GHz
1531 points/GHz
TOTAL
16588 points/GHz
11966 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4