Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Engineering Sample 506E8 3GHz
Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 506E8 3GHz is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the 506E8 3GHz gets 210.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 1 times faster than the 506E8 3GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the 506E8 3GHz gets 210.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 1 times faster than the 506E8 3GHz. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
506e8
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/8
TDP
85 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
8192 kB
Date
February 2020
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
58.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
210.91k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3206R
506E8 3GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
22.46k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
10.97k
20.45k (x1.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.54k
4.75k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.09k
10.39k (x2.04)
TOTAL
31.52k
58.05k (x1.84)
Multithread
3206R
506E8 3GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
103.33k
92.69k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
87.67k
90.45k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
22.02k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
5.75k (x1.17)
TOTAL
216.02k
210.91k (x0.98)
Performance/W
3206R
506E8 3GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
1216 points/W