Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Ryzen 5 5500U
Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 5500U is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the 5500U gets 261.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 5500U is 1.2 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the 5500U gets 261.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 5500U is 1.2 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
860f81
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Lucienne
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
8/8
6/12
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
February 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
53.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
261.91k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3206R
5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
15.63k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
10.97k
23k (x2.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.54k
8.62k (x3.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.09k
6.51k (x1.28)
TOTAL
31.52k
53.76k (x1.71)
Multithread
3206R
5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
103.33k
90.38k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
87.67k
118.74k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
48.39k (x2.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
4.4k (x0.9)
TOTAL
216.02k
261.91k (x1.21)
Performance/W
3206R
5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
1216 points/W
6025 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/W
7916 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
237 points/W
3226 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
294 points/W
TOTAL
2541 points/W
17461 points/W
Performance/GHz
3206R
5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
6801 points/GHz
3908 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5774 points/GHz
5750 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
2156 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2678 points/GHz
1628 points/GHz
TOTAL
16588 points/GHz
13441 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4