| | | | | | |

Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Ryzen 5 3600


Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.6 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
870f10
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/8
6/12
TDP
85 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
32768 kB
Date
February 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
348.35k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3206R
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
1.97k
4.2k (x2.14)
Test#2 (FP)
8.15k
17.36k (x2.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
7.5k (x3.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.84k
23.79k (x4.92)
TOTAL
17.32k
52.85k (x3.05)

Multithread

3206R

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
15.73k
22.11k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
64.78k
108.04k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
56.81k (x3.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
36.39k (x6.99)
TOTAL
103.77k
223.36k (x2.15)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3206R
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
16.04k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
10.97k
24.47k (x2.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.54k
8.38k (x3.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.09k
21.66k (x4.26)
TOTAL
31.52k
70.55k (x2.24)

Multithread

3206R

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
103.33k
113.63k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
87.67k
143.55k (x1.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
63.84k (x3.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
27.34k (x5.57)
TOTAL
216.02k
348.35k (x1.61)

Performance/W
3206R
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
1216 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
237 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
2541 points/W
5359 points/W

Performance/GHz
3206R
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
6801 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5774 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2678 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
16588 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4