Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Ryzen 5 1600
Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 1600 is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.3 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the 1600 gets 272.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 1600 is 1.3 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
800f11
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/8
6/12
TDP
85 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
February 2020
April 2017
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
56.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
272.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3206R
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
13.67k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
10.97k
22.28k (x2.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.54k
4.99k (x1.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.09k
15.22k (x2.99)
TOTAL
31.52k
56.16k (x1.78)
Multithread
3206R
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
103.33k
81.03k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
87.67k
145.84k (x1.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
39.14k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
6.79k (x1.38)
TOTAL
216.02k
272.8k (x1.26)
Performance/W
3206R
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
1216 points/W
1247 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/W
2244 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
237 points/W
602 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
2541 points/W
4197 points/W
Performance/GHz
3206R
1600
Test#1 (Integers)
6801 points/GHz
3797 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5774 points/GHz
6189 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
1387 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2678 points/GHz
4228 points/GHz
TOTAL
16588 points/GHz
15601 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4