Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Athlon X4 950
Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 950 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the 950 gets 99.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 2.2 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the 950 gets 99.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 2.2 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
660f51
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Bristol Ridge
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
AM4
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/4
TDP
85 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x96+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
0 kB
Date
February 2020
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
34.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
99.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3206R
950
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
12.44k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
10.97k
15.96k (x1.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.54k
3.54k (x1.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.09k
3k (x0.59)
TOTAL
31.52k
34.93k (x1.11)
Multithread
3206R
950
Test#1 (Integers)
103.33k
40.75k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
87.67k
42.07k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
12.53k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
4.45k (x0.91)
TOTAL
216.02k
99.8k (x0.46)
Performance/W
3206R
950
Test#1 (Integers)
1216 points/W
627 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/W
647 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
237 points/W
193 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
68 points/W
TOTAL
2541 points/W
1535 points/W
Performance/GHz
3206R
950
Test#1 (Integers)
6801 points/GHz
3274 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5774 points/GHz
4199 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
931 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2678 points/GHz
788 points/GHz
TOTAL
16588 points/GHz
9193 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4