Xeon Bronze 3206R vs A6 9220e
Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the 9220e is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the 9220e gets 29.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 7.3 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the 9220e gets 29.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 7.3 times faster than the 9220e. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
670f00
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
BGA-FT4
Cores/Threads
8/8
2/2
TDP
85 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
0 kB
Date
February 2020
June 2017
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
22.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
29.39k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3206R
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
7.84k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
10.97k
10.54k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.54k
2.27k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.09k
1.7k (x0.33)
TOTAL
31.52k
22.34k (x0.71)
Multithread
3206R
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
103.33k
11.42k (x0.11)
Test#2 (FP)
87.67k
12.58k (x0.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
3.62k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
1.77k (x0.36)
TOTAL
216.02k
29.39k (x0.14)
Performance/W
3206R
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
1216 points/W
1903 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/W
2097 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
237 points/W
603 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
296 points/W
TOTAL
2541 points/W
4898 points/W
Performance/GHz
3206R
9220e
Test#1 (Integers)
6801 points/GHz
3265 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5774 points/GHz
4390 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
944 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2678 points/GHz
709 points/GHz
TOTAL
16588 points/GHz
9309 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4