Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Core i7-1255U
Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i7-1255U is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the i7-1255U gets 258.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1255U is 1.2 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the i7-1255U gets 258.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1255U is 1.2 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
50657
906a4
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Alder Lake-U
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/8
10/12
TDP
85 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32/8x64+2x48/8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
2x1280+2x2048 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2020
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
81.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
258.31k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3206R
i7-1255U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
38.32k (x2.97)
Test#2 (FP)
10.97k
21.35k (x1.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.54k
11.2k (x4.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.09k
10.86k (x2.13)
TOTAL
31.52k
81.73k (x2.59)
Multithread
3206R
i7-1255U
Test#1 (Integers)
103.33k
105.48k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
87.67k
100.18k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
43.39k (x2.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
9.26k (x1.89)
TOTAL
216.02k
258.31k (x1.2)
Performance/W
3206R
i7-1255U
Test#1 (Integers)
1216 points/W
7032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/W
6678 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
237 points/W
2893 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
617 points/W
TOTAL
2541 points/W
17221 points/W
Performance/GHz
3206R
i7-1255U
Test#1 (Integers)
6801 points/GHz
8154 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5774 points/GHz
4543 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
2382 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2678 points/GHz
2311 points/GHz
TOTAL
16588 points/GHz
17390 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4