| | | | | | |

Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Core i7-1195G7


Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i7-1195G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the i7-1195G7 gets 239.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1195G7 is 1.1 times faster than the 3206R. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
806c2
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
BGA 1499
Cores/Threads
8/8
4/8
TDP
85 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2020
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
82.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
239.58k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3206R
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1.97k
4.57k (x2.33)
Test#2 (FP)
8.15k
17.21k (x2.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
9.97k (x4.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.84k
14.98k (x3.1)
TOTAL
17.32k
46.75k (x2.7)

Multithread

3206R

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
15.73k
12.75k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
64.78k
45.98k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
27.86k (x1.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
20.06k (x3.85)
TOTAL
103.77k
106.66k (x1.03)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3206R
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
30.89k (x2.39)
Test#2 (FP)
10.97k
25.57k (x2.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.54k
10.64k (x4.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.09k
15.66k (x3.08)
TOTAL
31.52k
82.77k (x2.63)

Multithread

3206R

i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
103.33k
96.34k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
87.67k
95.75k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
32.29k (x1.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
15.2k (x3.1)
TOTAL
216.02k
239.58k (x1.11)

Performance/W
3206R
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1216 points/W
3441 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/W
3420 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
237 points/W
1153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
543 points/W
TOTAL
2541 points/W
8557 points/W

Performance/GHz
3206R
i7-1195G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6801 points/GHz
6179 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5774 points/GHz
5115 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
2128 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2678 points/GHz
3133 points/GHz
TOTAL
16588 points/GHz
16555 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4