| | | | | | |

Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Core i5-11400T


Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i5-11400T is based on Rocket Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 103.8 k points while the i5-11400T gets 67.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.5 times faster than the i5-11400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
a0671
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Rocket Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/8
6/12
TDP
85 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
12288 kB
Date
February 2020
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
31.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
67.1k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3206R
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1.97k
3.51k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
8.15k
14.2k (x1.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
7.63k (x3.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.84k
6.06k (x1.25)
TOTAL
17.32k
31.39k (x1.81)

Multithread

3206R

i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.73k
7.4k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
64.78k
31.37k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
18.11k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
10.23k (x1.96)
TOTAL
103.77k
67.1k (x0.65)

Performance/W
3206R
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
185 points/W
211 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
762 points/W
896 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
212 points/W
518 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
61 points/W
292 points/W
TOTAL
1221 points/W
1917 points/W

Performance/GHz
3206R
i5-11400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1035 points/GHz
948 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4287 points/GHz
3838 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1246 points/GHz
2062 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2547 points/GHz
1637 points/GHz
TOTAL
9115 points/GHz
8485 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4