| | | | | | |

Xeon Bronze 3206R vs Core i3-1115G4


Description
The 3206R is based on Cascade Lake architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3206R gets a score of 216 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.

Summarizing, the 3206R is 1.6 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
50657
806c1
Core
Cascade Lake-SP
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.9 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
1.9 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
LGA 3647-0
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
8/8
2/4
TDP
85 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
8x1024 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
11264 kB
6144 kB
Date
February 2020
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
31.52k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
216.02k points
137.96k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3206R
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1.97k
3.75k (x1.91)
Test#2 (FP)
8.15k
17.22k (x2.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.37k
9.79k (x4.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.84k
8.21k (x1.7)
TOTAL
17.32k
38.97k (x2.25)

Multithread

3206R

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
15.73k
9.19k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
64.78k
35.47k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.06k
19.14k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.21k
5.82k (x1.12)
TOTAL
103.77k
69.62k (x0.67)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3206R
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
12.92k
24.25k (x1.88)
Test#2 (FP)
10.97k
21.63k (x1.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.54k
9.09k (x3.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.09k
7.23k (x1.42)
TOTAL
31.52k
62.19k (x1.97)

Multithread

3206R

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
103.33k
56.9k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
87.67k
55.68k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.1k
19.29k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.91k
6.09k (x1.24)
TOTAL
216.02k
137.96k (x0.64)

Performance/W
3206R
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1216 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1031 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
237 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
58 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
2541 points/W
4927 points/W

Performance/GHz
3206R
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
6801 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5774 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1334 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2678 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
16588 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4