Pentium N5000 vs P6200
Description
The N5000 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the P6200 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5000 gets a score of 54.8 k points while the P6200 gets 22.9 k points.
Summarizing, the N5000 is 2.4 times faster than the P6200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5000 gets a score of 54.8 k points while the P6200 gets 22.9 k points.
Summarizing, the N5000 is 2.4 times faster than the P6200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a1
20655
Core
Gemini Lake
Arrandale
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.133 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.133 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
Socket G1
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
6 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2017
September 2010
Mean monothread perf.
17.27k points
12.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
54.76k points
22.91k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5000
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
5.12k
5.29k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
7.66k
3.55k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.79k
2.1k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.7k
1.8k (x1.06)
TOTAL
17.27k
12.74k (x0.74)
Multithread
N5000
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
17.56k
10.06k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
25.71k
6.74k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.45k
3.96k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
2.16k (x1.06)
TOTAL
54.76k
22.91k (x0.42)
Performance/W
N5000
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
2927 points/W
287 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4284 points/W
193 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1574 points/W
113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
341 points/W
62 points/W
TOTAL
9127 points/W
655 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5000
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
1895 points/GHz
2478 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2838 points/GHz
1667 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1032 points/GHz
982 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
631 points/GHz
845 points/GHz
TOTAL
6396 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4