Pentium N5000 vs Core 2 Quad Q8400
Description
The N5000 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the Q8400 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5000 gets a score of 54.8 k points while the Q8400 gets 51.9 k points.
Summarizing, the N5000 is 1.1 times faster than the Q8400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N5000 gets a score of 54.8 k points while the Q8400 gets 51.9 k points.
Summarizing, the N5000 is 1.1 times faster than the Q8400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a1
1067a
Core
Gemini Lake
Yorkfield
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.666 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.7 GHz
2.666 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
6 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
128+128 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
December 2017
April 2009
Mean monothread perf.
17.27k points
14.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
54.76k points
51.92k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N5000
Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
5.12k
3.08k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
7.66k
6.8k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.79k
2.73k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.7k
1.42k (x0.83)
TOTAL
17.27k
14.04k (x0.81)
Multithread
N5000
Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
17.56k
12.25k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
25.71k
26.84k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
9.45k
10.82k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.05k
2.02k (x0.99)
TOTAL
54.76k
51.92k (x0.95)
Performance/W
N5000
Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
2927 points/W
129 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
4284 points/W
283 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1574 points/W
114 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
341 points/W
21 points/W
TOTAL
9127 points/W
547 points/W
Performance/GHz
N5000
Q8400
Test#1 (Integers)
1895 points/GHz
1157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2838 points/GHz
2551 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1032 points/GHz
1025 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
631 points/GHz
532 points/GHz
TOTAL
6396 points/GHz
5265 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4