Pentium T3400 vs E5500
Description
Both models T3400 and E5500 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T3400 gets a score of 13 k points while the E5500 gets 20.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5500 is 1.6 times faster than the T3400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T3400 gets a score of 13 k points while the E5500 gets 20.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5500 is 1.6 times faster than the T3400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fd
1067a
Core
Merom-2M
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.167 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
Socket P
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
October 2008
April 2010
Mean monothread perf.
8.05k points
12.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
14.91k points
20.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
T3400
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
1.86k
2.56k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
1.9k
6.54k (x3.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.42k
2.76k (x1.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.84k
0.91k (x1.09)
TOTAL
6.01k
12.77k (x2.12)
Multithread
T3400
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
4.04k
4.32k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
4.17k
10.8k (x2.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.55k
4.7k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.2k
0.87k (x0.73)
TOTAL
12.96k
20.69k (x1.6)
Performance/W
T3400
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
115 points/W
66 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
119 points/W
166 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
101 points/W
72 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
34 points/W
13 points/W
TOTAL
370 points/W
318 points/W
Performance/GHz
T3400
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
859 points/GHz
914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
875 points/GHz
2335 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
654 points/GHz
985 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
385 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
2773 points/GHz
4560 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4