Pentium T3400 vs E5200 (M0)
Description
Both models T3400 and E5200 (M0) are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T3400 gets a score of 14.9 k points while the E5200 (M0) gets 22 k points.
Summarizing, the E5200 (M0) is 1.5 times faster than the T3400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T3400 gets a score of 14.9 k points while the E5200 (M0) gets 22 k points.
Summarizing, the E5200 (M0) is 1.5 times faster than the T3400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fd
10676
Core
Merom-2M
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.167 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
Socket P
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
October 2008
August 2008
Mean monothread perf.
8.05k points
13.08k points
Mean multithread perf.
14.91k points
22.02k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T3400
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
2.49k
2.88k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
2.25k
6.31k (x2.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.17k
2.53k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.14k
1.35k (x1.18)
TOTAL
8.05k
13.08k (x1.62)
Multithread
T3400
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
4.98k
5.45k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
4.43k
11.5k (x2.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
4.02k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.23k
1.05k (x0.86)
TOTAL
14.91k
22.02k (x1.48)
Performance/W
T3400
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
142 points/W
84 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
127 points/W
177 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122 points/W
62 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
35 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
426 points/W
339 points/W
Performance/GHz
T3400
E5200 (M0)
Test#1 (Integers)
1150 points/GHz
1154 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1037 points/GHz
2526 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1002 points/GHz
1013 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
526 points/GHz
539 points/GHz
TOTAL
3714 points/GHz
5231 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4