Pentium T3400 vs Xeon Bronze 3206R
Description
The T3400 is based on Core architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T3400 gets a score of 13 k points while the 3206R gets 103.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 8 times faster than the T3400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T3400 gets a score of 13 k points while the 3206R gets 103.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 3206R is 8 times faster than the T3400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fd
50657
Core
Merom-2M
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
2.167 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
Socket P
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/8
TDP
35 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
11264 kB
Date
October 2008
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
8.05k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
14.91k points
216.02k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
T3400
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
1.86k
1.97k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
1.9k
8.15k (x4.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.42k
2.37k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.84k
4.84k (x5.79)
TOTAL
6.01k
17.32k (x2.88)
Multithread
T3400
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
4.04k
15.73k (x3.89)
Test#2 (FP)
4.17k
64.78k (x15.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.55k
18.06k (x5.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.2k
5.21k (x4.32)
TOTAL
12.96k
103.77k (x8.01)
Performance/W
T3400
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
115 points/W
185 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
119 points/W
762 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
101 points/W
212 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
34 points/W
61 points/W
TOTAL
370 points/W
1221 points/W
Performance/GHz
T3400
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
859 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
875 points/GHz
4287 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
654 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
385 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
TOTAL
2773 points/GHz
9115 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4