Pentium T3400 vs P6200
Description
The T3400 is based on Core architecture while the P6200 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T3400 gets a score of 14.9 k points while the P6200 gets 22.9 k points.
Summarizing, the P6200 is 1.5 times faster than the T3400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T3400 gets a score of 14.9 k points while the P6200 gets 22.9 k points.
Summarizing, the P6200 is 1.5 times faster than the T3400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fd
20655
Core
Merom-2M
Arrandale
Base frecuency
2.167 GHz
2.133 GHz
Socket
Socket P
Socket G1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
October 2008
September 2010
Mean monothread perf.
8.05k points
12.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
14.91k points
22.91k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T3400
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
2.49k
5.29k (x2.12)
Test#2 (FP)
2.25k
3.55k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.17k
2.1k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.14k
1.8k (x1.58)
TOTAL
8.05k
12.74k (x1.58)
Multithread
T3400
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
4.98k
10.06k (x2.02)
Test#2 (FP)
4.43k
6.74k (x1.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
3.96k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.23k
2.16k (x1.76)
TOTAL
14.91k
22.91k (x1.54)
Performance/W
T3400
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
142 points/W
287 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
127 points/W
193 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122 points/W
113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
35 points/W
62 points/W
TOTAL
426 points/W
655 points/W
Performance/GHz
T3400
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
1150 points/GHz
2478 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1037 points/GHz
1667 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1002 points/GHz
982 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
526 points/GHz
845 points/GHz
TOTAL
3714 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4