Pentium T3400 vs Core 2 Duo E7200
Description
Both models T3400 and E7200 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T3400 gets a score of 14.9 k points while the E7200 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E7200 is 1.7 times faster than the T3400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T3400 gets a score of 14.9 k points while the E7200 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the E7200 is 1.7 times faster than the T3400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fd
10676
Core
Merom-2M
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.167 GHz
2.533 GHz
Socket
Socket P
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
3072 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
October 2008
April 2008
Mean monothread perf.
8.05k points
13.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
14.91k points
25.21k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
T3400
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
1.86k
2.33k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
1.9k
5.96k (x3.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.42k
2.5k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.84k
1.45k (x1.74)
TOTAL
6.01k
12.23k (x2.04)
Multithread
T3400
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
4.04k
4.65k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
4.17k
11.87k (x2.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.55k
5.01k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.2k
1.23k (x1.02)
TOTAL
12.96k
22.76k (x1.76)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T3400
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
2.49k
2.93k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
2.25k
6.48k (x2.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.17k
2.6k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.14k
1.45k (x1.28)
TOTAL
8.05k
13.46k (x1.67)
Multithread
T3400
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
4.98k
5.85k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
4.43k
12.91k (x2.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
5.22k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.23k
1.23k (x1.01)
TOTAL
14.91k
25.21k (x1.69)
Performance/W
T3400
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
142 points/W
90 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
127 points/W
199 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122 points/W
80 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
35 points/W
19 points/W
TOTAL
426 points/W
388 points/W
Performance/GHz
T3400
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
1150 points/GHz
1155 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1037 points/GHz
2558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1002 points/GHz
1028 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
526 points/GHz
574 points/GHz
TOTAL
3714 points/GHz
5315 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4