Pentium T3400 vs Celeron N2840
Description
The T3400 is based on Core architecture while the N2840 is based on Silvermont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T3400 gets a score of 14.9 k points while the N2840 gets 16.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N2840 is 1.1 times faster than the T3400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T3400 gets a score of 14.9 k points while the N2840 gets 16.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N2840 is 1.1 times faster than the T3400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fd
30678
Core
Merom-2M
Bay Trail-M
Base frecuency
2.167 GHz
2.167 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.167 GHz
2.58 GHz
Socket
Socket P
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
7,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x24 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
October 2008
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
8.05k points
10.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
14.91k points
16.79k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T3400
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
2.49k
4.8k (x1.93)
Test#2 (FP)
2.25k
2.47k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.17k
1.86k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.14k
1.22k (x1.07)
TOTAL
8.05k
10.36k (x1.29)
Multithread
T3400
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
4.98k
8.24k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
4.43k
4.19k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
3.05k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.23k
1.32k (x1.07)
TOTAL
14.91k
16.79k (x1.13)
Performance/W
T3400
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
142 points/W
1177 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
127 points/W
598 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122 points/W
436 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
35 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
426 points/W
2399 points/W
Performance/GHz
T3400
N2840
Test#1 (Integers)
1150 points/GHz
1861 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1037 points/GHz
958 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1002 points/GHz
723 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
526 points/GHz
472 points/GHz
TOTAL
3714 points/GHz
4015 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4