| | | | | | |

Pentium T3400 vs Celeron J1900


Description
The T3400 is based on Core architecture while the J1900 is based on Silvermont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T3400 gets a score of 14.9 k points while the J1900 gets 33.2 k points.

Summarizing, the J1900 is 2.2 times faster than the T3400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
6fd
30679
Core
Merom-2M
Bay Trail-D
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.167 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.167 GHz
2.42 GHz
Socket
Socket P
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
35 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
October 2008
November 2013
Mean monothread perf.
8.05k points
9.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
14.91k points
33.25k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
T3400
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
1.86k
1.24k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
1.9k
1.77k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.42k
1.65k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.84k
1.15k (x1.37)
TOTAL
6.01k
5.81k (x0.97)

Multithread

T3400

J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
4.04k
4.68k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
4.17k
6.67k (x1.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.55k
6.15k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.2k
1.45k (x1.21)
TOTAL
12.96k
18.96k (x1.46)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T3400
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
2.49k
4.58k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
2.25k
2.32k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.17k
1.72k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.14k
1.14k (x1)
TOTAL
8.05k
9.75k (x1.21)

Multithread

T3400

J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
4.98k
17.16k (x3.45)
Test#2 (FP)
4.43k
8.42k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
6.22k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.23k
1.44k (x1.18)
TOTAL
14.91k
33.25k (x2.23)

Performance/W
T3400
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
142 points/W
1716 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
127 points/W
842 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122 points/W
622 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
35 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
426 points/W
3325 points/W

Performance/GHz
T3400
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
1150 points/GHz
1893 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1037 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1002 points/GHz
709 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
526 points/GHz
470 points/GHz
TOTAL
3714 points/GHz
4029 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4