Pentium T3400 vs Celeron E3300
Description
Both models T3400 and E3300 are based on Core architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T3400 gets a score of 14.9 k points while the E3300 gets 24.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E3300 is 1.7 times faster than the T3400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T3400 gets a score of 14.9 k points while the E3300 gets 24.6 k points.
Summarizing, the E3300 is 1.7 times faster than the T3400. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fd
1067a
Core
Merom-2M
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
2.167 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
Socket P
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
October 2008
August 2009
Mean monothread perf.
8.05k points
12.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
14.91k points
24.6k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
T3400
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
1.86k
2.29k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
1.9k
5.87k (x3.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.42k
2.49k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.84k
1.01k (x1.21)
TOTAL
6.01k
11.66k (x1.94)
Multithread
T3400
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
4.04k
4.57k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
4.17k
11.66k (x2.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.55k
4.89k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.2k
1.04k (x0.86)
TOTAL
12.96k
22.16k (x1.71)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T3400
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
2.49k
2.9k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
2.25k
6.38k (x2.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.17k
2.59k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.14k
1.08k (x0.94)
TOTAL
8.05k
12.94k (x1.61)
Multithread
T3400
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
4.98k
5.76k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
4.43k
12.67k (x2.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
5.16k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.23k
1.01k (x0.83)
TOTAL
14.91k
24.6k (x1.65)
Performance/W
T3400
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
142 points/W
89 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
127 points/W
195 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122 points/W
79 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
35 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
426 points/W
378 points/W
Performance/GHz
T3400
E3300
Test#1 (Integers)
1150 points/GHz
1159 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1037 points/GHz
2551 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1002 points/GHz
1034 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
526 points/GHz
431 points/GHz
TOTAL
3714 points/GHz
5175 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4