Pentium T3400 vs C Series C-60
Description
The T3400 is based on Core architecture while the C-60 is based on Bobcat.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T3400 gets a score of 14.9 k points while the C-60 gets 8.5 k points.
Summarizing, the T3400 is 1.8 times faster than the C-60. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the T3400 gets a score of 14.9 k points while the C-60 gets 8.5 k points.
Summarizing, the T3400 is 1.8 times faster than the C-60. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
6fd
500f20
Core
Merom-2M
Ontario
Base frecuency
2.167 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.167 GHz
1.33 GHz
Socket
Socket P
Socket FT1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
35 W
9 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
1024 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
October 2008
August 2011
Mean monothread perf.
8.05k points
4.79k points
Mean multithread perf.
14.91k points
8.53k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
T3400
C-60
Test#1 (Integers)
1.86k
0.66k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
1.9k
1.91k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.42k
1.11k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.84k
0.52k (x0.62)
TOTAL
6.01k
4.2k (x0.7)
Multithread
T3400
C-60
Test#1 (Integers)
4.04k
0.89k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
4.17k
2.67k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.55k
1.53k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.2k
0.6k (x0.5)
TOTAL
12.96k
5.68k (x0.44)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
T3400
C-60
Test#1 (Integers)
2.49k
1.32k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
2.25k
1.94k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.17k
1.07k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.14k
0.45k (x0.4)
TOTAL
8.05k
4.79k (x0.59)
Multithread
T3400
C-60
Test#1 (Integers)
4.98k
2.36k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
4.43k
3.52k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
1.92k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.23k
0.73k (x0.6)
TOTAL
14.91k
8.53k (x0.57)
Performance/W
T3400
C-60
Test#1 (Integers)
142 points/W
262 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
127 points/W
391 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
122 points/W
213 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
35 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
426 points/W
948 points/W
Performance/GHz
T3400
C-60
Test#1 (Integers)
1150 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1037 points/GHz
1461 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1002 points/GHz
802 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
526 points/GHz
342 points/GHz
TOTAL
3714 points/GHz
3599 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4