Pentium D 950 vs Pentium P6200
Description
The 950 is based on NetBurst architecture while the P6200 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 950 gets a score of 7.3 k points while the P6200 gets 22.9 k points.
Summarizing, the P6200 is 3.1 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 950 gets a score of 7.3 k points while the P6200 gets 22.9 k points.
Summarizing, the P6200 is 3.1 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f64
20655
Core
Presler
Arrandale
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.133 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket G1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
130 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+8 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2006
September 2010
Mean monothread perf.
8.73k points
12.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
7.34k points
22.91k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
950
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
2.36k
5.29k (x2.24)
Test#2 (FP)
3.74k
3.55k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.76k
2.1k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.86k
1.8k (x2.1)
TOTAL
8.73k
12.74k (x1.46)
Multithread
950
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
4.34k
10.06k (x2.32)
Test#2 (FP)
1.91k
6.74k (x3.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0.75k
3.96k (x5.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.35k
2.16k (x6.2)
TOTAL
7.34k
22.91k (x3.12)
Performance/W
950
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
33 points/W
287 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
15 points/W
193 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6 points/W
113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
3 points/W
62 points/W
TOTAL
56 points/W
655 points/W
Performance/GHz
950
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
695 points/GHz
2478 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1101 points/GHz
1667 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
518 points/GHz
982 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
253 points/GHz
845 points/GHz
TOTAL
2567 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4