Pentium D 925 vs Snapdragon 7c Gen 2
Description
The 925 is based on NetBurst architecture while the 7c Gen 2 is based on Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468).
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 925 gets a score of 14 k points while the 7c Gen 2 gets 37 k points.
Summarizing, the 7c Gen 2 is 2.6 times faster than the 925. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 925 gets a score of 14 k points while the 7c Gen 2 gets 37 k points.
Summarizing, the 7c Gen 2 is 2.6 times faster than the 925. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f65
f4a
Core
Presler
Cortex-A76 / A55 (Kryo 468)
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.55 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
-
Cores/Threads
2/2
8/8
TDP
95 W
7 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+8 kB
- kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
- kB
Cache L3
0 kB
- kB
Date
October 2006
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
7.7k points
16.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
14.03k points
37k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
925
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
2.06k
3.87k (x1.88)
Test#2 (FP)
3.32k
8.17k (x2.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.52k
2.67k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.8k
1.82k (x2.27)
TOTAL
7.7k
16.53k (x2.15)
Multithread
925
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
4k
3.46k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
6.32k
22.59k (x3.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.91k
8.09k (x2.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.81k
2.85k (x3.53)
TOTAL
14.03k
37k (x2.64)
Performance/W
925
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
42 points/W
495 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
67 points/W
3228 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31 points/W
1156 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
9 points/W
407 points/W
TOTAL
148 points/W
5286 points/W
Performance/GHz
925
7c Gen 2
Test#1 (Integers)
686 points/GHz
1516 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1105 points/GHz
3205 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
507 points/GHz
1047 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
266 points/GHz
712 points/GHz
TOTAL
2565 points/GHz
6481 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4