Pentium D 925 vs Pentium E5500
Description
The 925 is based on NetBurst architecture while the E5500 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 925 gets a score of 12.3 k points while the E5500 gets 20.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5500 is 1.7 times faster than the 925. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 925 gets a score of 12.3 k points while the E5500 gets 20.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5500 is 1.7 times faster than the 925. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f65
1067a
Core
Presler
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+8 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2048 kB
Date
October 2006
April 2010
Mean monothread perf.
7.7k points
12.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
14.03k points
20.69k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
925
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
1.52k
2.56k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
2.95k
6.54k (x2.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.51k
2.76k (x1.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.82k
0.91k (x1.12)
TOTAL
6.79k
12.77k (x1.88)
Multithread
925
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
2.98k
4.32k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
5.62k
10.8k (x1.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.87k
4.7k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.82k
0.87k (x1.07)
TOTAL
12.29k
20.69k (x1.68)
Performance/W
925
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
31 points/W
66 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
59 points/W
166 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
30 points/W
72 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
9 points/W
13 points/W
TOTAL
129 points/W
318 points/W
Performance/GHz
925
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
507 points/GHz
914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
983 points/GHz
2335 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
502 points/GHz
985 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
272 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
2264 points/GHz
4560 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4