Pentium D 925 vs 950
Description
Both models 925 and 950 are based on NetBurst architecture.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 925 gets a score of 14 k points while the 950 gets 7.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 925 is 1.9 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 925 gets a score of 14 k points while the 950 gets 7.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 925 is 1.9 times faster than the 950. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f65
f64
Core
Presler
Presler
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
95 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+8 kB
16+8 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
October 2006
January 2006
Mean monothread perf.
7.7k points
8.73k points
Mean multithread perf.
14.03k points
7.34k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
925
950
Test#1 (Integers)
2.06k
2.36k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
3.32k
3.74k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.52k
1.76k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.8k
0.86k (x1.07)
TOTAL
7.7k
8.73k (x1.13)
Multithread
925
950
Test#1 (Integers)
4k
4.34k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
6.32k
1.91k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.91k
0.75k (x0.26)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.81k
0.35k (x0.43)
TOTAL
14.03k
7.34k (x0.52)
Performance/W
925
950
Test#1 (Integers)
42 points/W
33 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
67 points/W
15 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31 points/W
6 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
9 points/W
3 points/W
TOTAL
148 points/W
56 points/W
Performance/GHz
925
950
Test#1 (Integers)
686 points/GHz
695 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1105 points/GHz
1101 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
507 points/GHz
518 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
266 points/GHz
253 points/GHz
TOTAL
2565 points/GHz
2567 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4