Pentium D 925 vs Core 2 Quad Q6700
Description
The 925 is based on NetBurst architecture while the Q6700 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 925 gets a score of 14 k points while the Q6700 gets 19.8 k points.
Summarizing, the Q6700 is 1.4 times faster than the 925. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 925 gets a score of 14 k points while the Q6700 gets 19.8 k points.
Summarizing, the Q6700 is 1.4 times faster than the 925. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f65
6fb
Core
Presler
Kentsfield
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.666 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
95 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+8 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
8192 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
October 2006
April 2007
Mean monothread perf.
7.7k points
10.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
14.03k points
19.77k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
925
Q6700
Test#1 (Integers)
2.06k
3.06k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
3.32k
2.74k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.52k
2.56k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.8k
1.68k (x2.11)
TOTAL
7.7k
10.05k (x1.31)
Multithread
925
Q6700
Test#1 (Integers)
4k
7.28k (x1.82)
Test#2 (FP)
6.32k
5.83k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.91k
5.13k (x1.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.81k
1.53k (x1.9)
TOTAL
14.03k
19.77k (x1.41)
Performance/W
925
Q6700
Test#1 (Integers)
42 points/W
77 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
67 points/W
61 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31 points/W
54 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
9 points/W
16 points/W
TOTAL
148 points/W
208 points/W
Performance/GHz
925
Q6700
Test#1 (Integers)
686 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1105 points/GHz
1029 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
507 points/GHz
962 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
266 points/GHz
632 points/GHz
TOTAL
2565 points/GHz
3768 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4