Pentium D 925 vs Core 2 Duo T7100
Description
The 925 is based on NetBurst architecture while the T7100 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 925 gets a score of 14 k points while the T7100 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 925 is 1.1 times faster than the T7100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 925 gets a score of 14 k points while the T7100 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 925 is 1.1 times faster than the T7100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f65
6fd
Core
Presler
Merom
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket P
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+8 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2048 kB
Date
October 2006
May 2007
Mean monothread perf.
7.7k points
7.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
14.03k points
12.9k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
925
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
2.06k
2.08k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
3.32k
1.86k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.52k
1.86k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.8k
1.25k (x1.56)
TOTAL
7.7k
7.05k (x0.92)
Multithread
925
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
4k
4.16k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
6.32k
3.73k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.91k
3.73k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.81k
1.28k (x1.59)
TOTAL
14.03k
12.9k (x0.92)
Performance/W
925
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
42 points/W
119 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
67 points/W
107 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31 points/W
106 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
9 points/W
37 points/W
TOTAL
148 points/W
369 points/W
Performance/GHz
925
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
686 points/GHz
1157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1105 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
507 points/GHz
1034 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
266 points/GHz
692 points/GHz
TOTAL
2565 points/GHz
3916 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4