| | | |

Pentium D 925 vs Celeron D 341


Description
Both models 925 and 341 are based on NetBurst architecture.



Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 925 gets a score of 14 k points while the 341 gets 0 k points.

Summarizing, the 925 is INF times faster than the 341. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
f65
f41
Core
Presler
Prescott
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
2.93 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
1/1
TDP
95 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+8 kB
16+16 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
256 kB
Date
October 2006
September 2004

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
925
341
Test#1 (Integers)
1521
1499 (-1.47%)
Test#2 (FP)
2948
2713 (-7.98%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1506
1317 (-12.53%)
Test#1 (Memory)
816
617 (-24.38%)
TOTAL
6791
6146 (-9.50%)

Multithread

925

341
Test#1 (Integers)
2982
0 (-100.00%)
Test#2 (FP)
5616
0 (-100.00%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2870
0 (-100.00%)
Test#1 (Memory)
819
0 (-100.00%)
TOTAL
12287
0 (-100.00%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
925
341
Test#1 (Integers)
2059
2050 (-0.43%)
Test#2 (FP)
3316
3246 (-2.10%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1522
1554 (2.10%)
Test#1 (Memory)
799
625 (-21.83%)
TOTAL
7696
7475 (-2.87%)

Multithread

925

341
Test#1 (Integers)
3995
0 (-100.00%)
Test#2 (FP)
6318
0 (-100.00%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2905
0 (-100.00%)
Test#1 (Memory)
808
0 (-100.00%)
TOTAL
14027
0 (-100.00%)

Performance/W
925
341
Test#1 (Integers)
42 points/W
0 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
67 points/W
0 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31 points/W
0 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
9 points/W
0 points/W
TOTAL
148 points/W
0 points/W

Performance/GHz
925
341
Test#1 (Integers)
686 points/GHz
700 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1105 points/GHz
1108 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
507 points/GHz
530 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
266 points/GHz
213 points/GHz
TOTAL
2565 points/GHz
2551 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8