| | | |

Pentium D 925 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2160


Description
The 925 is based on NetBurst architecture while the E2160 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 925 gets a score of 14 k points while the E2160 gets 12.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 925 is 1.1 times faster than the E2160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
f65
6f2
Core
Presler
Allendale
Architecture
Base frecuency
3 GHz
1.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+8 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
1024 kB
Date
October 2006
Jun 2007

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
925
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
1521
1812 (19.09%)
Test#2 (FP)
2948
1811 (-38.56%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1506
1794 (19.18%)
Test#1 (Memory)
816
1161 (42.23%)
TOTAL
6791
6578 (-3.14%)

Multithread

925

E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
2982
3619 (21.37%)
Test#2 (FP)
5616
3610 (-35.72%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2870
3593 (25.18%)
Test#1 (Memory)
819
1189 (45.24%)
TOTAL
12287
12011 (-2.24%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
925
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
2059
2080 (1.00%)
Test#2 (FP)
3316
1878 (-43.37%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1522
1889 (24.13%)
Test#1 (Memory)
799
1158 (44.87%)
TOTAL
7696
7004 (-8.99%)

Multithread

925

E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
3995
4158 (4.07%)
Test#2 (FP)
6318
3739 (-40.82%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2905
3783 (30.19%)
Test#1 (Memory)
808
1189 (47.15%)
TOTAL
14027
12869 (-8.26%)

Performance/W
925
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
42 points/W
64 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
67 points/W
58 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31 points/W
58 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
9 points/W
18 points/W
TOTAL
148 points/W
198 points/W

Performance/GHz
925
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
686 points/GHz
1155 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1105 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
507 points/GHz
1050 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
266 points/GHz
643 points/GHz
TOTAL
2565 points/GHz
3891 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8