Pentium D 925 vs Athlon II X2 260
Description
The 925 is based on NetBurst architecture while the 260 is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 925 gets a score of 14 k points while the 260 gets 27.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 260 is 2 times faster than the 925. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 925 gets a score of 14 k points while the 260 gets 27.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 260 is 2 times faster than the 925. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
f65
100f63
Core
Presler
Regor
Base frecuency
3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+8 kB
2x128 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
October 2006
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
7.7k points
17.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
14.03k points
27.54k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
925
260
Test#1 (Integers)
2.06k
6.04k (x2.93)
Test#2 (FP)
3.32k
6.2k (x1.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.52k
3.11k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.8k
1.7k (x2.13)
TOTAL
7.7k
17.05k (x2.22)
Multithread
925
260
Test#1 (Integers)
4k
10.02k (x2.51)
Test#2 (FP)
6.32k
10.18k (x1.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.91k
5.1k (x1.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
0.81k
2.25k (x2.78)
TOTAL
14.03k
27.54k (x1.96)
Performance/W
925
260
Test#1 (Integers)
42 points/W
154 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
67 points/W
157 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
31 points/W
78 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
9 points/W
35 points/W
TOTAL
148 points/W
424 points/W
Performance/GHz
925
260
Test#1 (Integers)
686 points/GHz
1886 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1105 points/GHz
1939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
507 points/GHz
971 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
266 points/GHz
532 points/GHz
TOTAL
2565 points/GHz
5328 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4